Re: Slow select, insert, update
От | Bill Montgomery |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slow select, insert, update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41191A5C.7020409@lulu.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Slow select, insert, update (Paul Langard <pjl@intercellsolutions.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Paul, Paul Langard wrote: > Having trouble with one table (see time to count records below!). > > Fairly new to postgres so any help much appreciated. > > It only contains 9,106 records - as you can see from: > > > select count(id) from project > > *count > *9106 > 1 row(s) > Total runtime: 45,778.813 ms <snip> > ... the database is regularly vaccuumed. Have you tried doing a VACUUM FULL, CLUSTER, or drop/restore on the table? This sounds symptomatic of a table with a bunch of dead tuples not in the FSM (free space map). Only tuples in the FSM are reclaimed by a regular VACUUM. If your FSM parameters in postgresql.conf are not big enough for your ratio of UPDATE/DELETE operations to VACUUM frequency, you will end up with dead tuples that will only be reclaimed by a VACUUM FULL. To prevent this problem in the future, look at increasing your FSM size and possibly vacuuming more frequently or using pg_autovacuum. Good Luck, Bill Montgomery
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: