Re: fsync vs open_sync
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fsync vs open_sync |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4118159B.2030605@coretech.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | fsync vs open_sync (pgsql@mohawksoft.com) |
Ответы |
Re: fsync vs open_sync
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Just out of interest, what happens to the difference if you use *ext3* (perhaps with data=writeback) regards Mark pgsql@mohawksoft.com wrote: >I did a little test on the various options of fsync. >... >create table testndx (value integer, name varchar); >create index testndx_val on testndx (value); > >for(int i=0; i < 1000000; i++) >{ > printf_query( "insert into testndx (value, name) values ('%d', 'test')", >random()); > > // report here >} > > >Anyway, with fsync enabled using standard fsync(), I get roughly 300-400 >inserts per second. With fsync disabled, I get about 7000 inserts per >second. When I re-enable fsync but use the open_sync option, I can get >about 2500 inserts per second. > >(This is on Linux 2.4 kernel, ext2 file system) > > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: