Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?)
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4115B123.2010001@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dump and sequences (bug ?) (strk <strk@keybit.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Also, given this and your previous operator commutator problem, I strongly suspect that someone has taken an axe to the system catalogs on your installation and they are very screwy. Chris strk wrote: > Using pg_dump from postgresql 7.3.4 I've obtained > a dump file containing a SEQUENCE SET with no > corresponding SEQUENCE. I've seen that this is usually > due to the presence of a table with a 'serial' field, > but since in this case there is no such table I wonder > if this is a bug in pg_dump. > > The only reason I can imagine for this is pg_dump taking > any sequence whose name ends in _seq as being associated > to a table, no matter if that table exists and has a 'serial' > field. Is this possible ? Shouldn't this kind of dependency > be coded somehow ? > > TIA > > --strk; > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: