Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?)
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4115B0D0.4070103@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dump and sequences (bug ?) (strk <strk@keybit.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Using pg_dump from postgresql 7.3.4 I've obtained > a dump file containing a SEQUENCE SET with no > corresponding SEQUENCE. I've seen that this is usually > due to the presence of a table with a 'serial' field, > but since in this case there is no such table I wonder > if this is a bug in pg_dump. Perhaps. Is there any way you can send me the compressed pg_dump -s output of your database? Is it sensitive info? How certain are you that there is no serial column in your database? > The only reason I can imagine for this is pg_dump taking > any sequence whose name ends in _seq as being associated > to a table, no matter if that table exists and has a 'serial' > field. Is this possible ? Shouldn't this kind of dependency > be coded somehow ? It is coded somehow and pg_dump in no way treats things that end in _seq as being on tables. My first suspicion is that you must be mistaken, but i would really like to see the full pg_dump -s output of your database.... Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: