Re: Updateable Views?
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updateable Views? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4114E622.7070306@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Updateable Views? (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Updateable Views?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/3/2004 11:38 PM, Greg Stark wrote: > "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest.net> writes: > >> On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 13:05, CSN wrote: >> > Just wondering, is updateable views slated for a >> > future version of Postgresql? In addition to using >> > rules that is. >> >> I would think that a basic fleshing out of the logic with some kind of >> stored proc to make the views and triggers would likely get someone >> started on the backend work. You know, a proof of concept thingy. > > I have some fears here. It seems everyone's first thought when they think > about updateable views is to think about constructing rules on the views. > > How would that approach help with inline views? Things like: > > UPDATE (SELECT a+b AS x, c AS y FROM foo) SET c=1 WHERE x = 10 There is no such thing as an "inline view". What you show here is a subselect, and I have not heard of "updatable subselects" yet. Could you point me to the section in the ANSI SQL specifications that describes this feature please? Jan > > It seems like starting with these types of views in the backend would be more > productive than implementing something in rules. Once postgres can handle > inline views it should be trivial to handle persistent views just like they're > handled on selects. > -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: