Re: PostgreSQL ping/pong to client
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL ping/pong to client |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4113.1555520660@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL ping/pong to client (Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:49 PM Ajay Pratap <ajaypratap@drishti-soft.com> wrote: >> Correction: I meant when my java application dies postgres should break all the connections that were associated withthat peer. > And how is the server supposed to detect that without keepalives? TCP > is dessigned to survice for extended period of times without traffic, > I used that a lot in the dial up times. > And what makes you think keepalives are impactful and unrealistic? I > use them a lot, they do not impact my workloads measurably. If we tried to do something about that in the server code proper, we'd basically be reinventing TCP keepalives --- probably badly. And we couldn't do it at all without a protocol version break, because the client-side code would also need to know about it. Just use the keepalive facility. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: