Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3
Дата
Msg-id 4111.1216178778@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Ответы Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3
Список pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> So I guess my question is: what is wrong with the  properties for  
> citextsend/citextrecv

[ checks catalogs... ] textsend and textrecv are marked STABLE not
IMMUTABLE.  I am not totally sure about the reasoning offhand --- it
might be because their behavior depends on client_encoding.

> and what else might these failures be indicating  
> is wrong?

I think the other diffs are okay, they just reflect the fact that you're
depending on binary equivalence of text and citext.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: