Re: Server discovery
От | Andreas Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Server discovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41100FA9.2010303@pse-consulting.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Server discovery ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] >>Sent: 03 August 2004 13:05 >>To: Dave Page >>Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org >>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Server discovery >> >>That means additional/different keys? >>If the services is rediscovered every time, how will you >>distinguish them from the same server entered manually? >> >>Autodiscovery on every startup might result in annoyingly >>popping up servers you already changed manually to your >>needs. This seems undesirable. > > > Absolutely. I already did this for LastDatabase and LastSchema, which > instead of being stored as HKCU\Software\pgAdmin > III\Servers\LastSchemaNN as they are for manually added servers, are > stored as HKCU\Software\pgAdmin III\Servers\LastSchema-XXXX, where XXXX > is the short name of the installed service. That way, as long as the > user doesn't change the name of the service, the changed values will get > re-attached at the next startup. > > I'm toying with adding the hostname into the mix as well, just to > prevent possible mixups wth roaming pofiles. Not sure how likely that > scenario is, but I guess it won't hurt. Frankly, this appears overdesigned to me. Why not just adding discovered servers at installation time? Regards, Andreas
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: