Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
Дата
Msg-id 4110.929631918@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>>>> Config.h has this.  Does this need to be updated because we can't vacuum
>>>> multi-segment relations?  I have changed it to 7F000000:
>> 
>> Why?  I thought we'd fixed the mdtruncate issue.

> I am told we did not by Hiroshi.  It was news to me too.

Then we'd better fix the underlying problem.  We can't change
RELSEG_SIZE for a minor release, unless you want to give up the
principle of not forcing initdb at minor releases.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig