Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
От | Hans-Jürgen Schönig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 410C928A.3010106@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hello, > > Version 7.5 is as close to a major release as I have seen in the almost > 9 years I have been using PostgreSQL. > This release brings about a lot of "enterprise" features that have been > holding back PostgreSQL in a big way for > for a long time. > > All of my serious customers; potential, existing and past has all at one > point or another requested most if not > all of the features being released onto the world with 7.5. In fact the > only ones that I can think of off the top > of my head that isn't in the current list of availables is table > partitioning and to a lesser extent two phase commit. > > This release definately deserves a major version jump. If it were up to > me it would be more than one (I would > call it 10h for obvious reasons. O.k. the h is a joke but I am serious > about the 10) just from a marketing > standpoint. I could argue a major version jump just from the fact that > we finally have a port to the most used > operating system (regardless if that is good or bad) in the world. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake They have tried to do the same for "With Naked Gun" (I think it is called in English). They called the second film "With Naked Gun 2 1/2". The third version was called "33 1/3" then ... Maybe the tenth film would be 10^256 then ... 8.0 would be ok but I am pretty against jumping version number - they have such a pure marketing flavour ("we have a high version number but we don't know what else we should tell you about the new release"). Database work should be "conservative" which means slowly but surely ... - from my point of view this conflicts with pumping version numbers. I don't think there will be one more user just because of a different version number. Maybe a hostily overtake of Oracle (not Firebird as mentioned by Peter) would justify 10.0.0 ;). Regards, Hans -- Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria Tel: +43/720/10 1234567 or +43/664/816 40 77 www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: