Re: Point in Time Recovery
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4108C496.2030801@coretech.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Point in Time Recovery (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Point in Time Recovery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I was wondering about this point - might it not be just as reasonable for the copied file to *be* an exact image of pg_control? Then a very simple variant of pg_controldata (or maybe even just adding switches to pg_controldata itself) would enable the relevant info to be extracted P.s : would love to be that volunteer - however up to the eyeballs in Business Objects (cringe) and Db2 for the next week or so.... regards Mark Bruce Momjian wrote: >We need someone to code two backend functions to complete PITR. > >>><snippage> >>> >>> >>>>However, once you decide to do things like that, there is no reason why >>>>the copied file has to be an exact image of pg_control. I claim it >>>>would be more useful if the copied file were plain text so that you >>>>could just "cat" it to find out the starting WAL position; that would >>>>let you determine without any special tools what range of WAL archive >>>>files you are going to need to bring back from your archives. >>>> >>>> >>>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: