Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend
От | Andreas Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41050F0F.40401@pse-consulting.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend
Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > > If you don't mind plastering a "use at your own risk" sign on it, then > go for it. killing a backend is obviously much more "at your own risk" than a descent function. Taken from your mail, I understand that a killed backend might leave some loose ends, eg. open locks, which would degrade the cluster's performance. Still, it should not corrupt the shared mem, just leave it as if the backend's still alive and sleeping, right? You'd kill a backend only if your complete cluster is suffering from it, and you hope to keep it running by just shooting that process. If the cluster still has that uncleaned locks or so, you're unlucky and need to shutdown the cluster. Maybe we should supply a restricted version of pg_terminate_backend that's callable from admin interfaces only so we can make sure that the user was warned what he's doing before the termination is executed, something like that: ticket := select pg_admin_ticket(); /* calculate well-known stuff on ticket and issue before it times out */ select pg_terminate_backend(ticket_hash); Regards, Andreas
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: