Re: hardware raid suggestions
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: hardware raid suggestions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41050EAB.6060901@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | hardware raid suggestions (Brian Hirt <bhirt@mobygames.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Brian Hirt wrote: > I've been using the adaptec ZCR raid cards in our servers for a while > now, mostly small systems with 3 or 6 disks, and we've been very happy > with them. However, we're building a new DB machine with 14 U320 15K > SCA drives, and we've run into a performance bottlenkeck with the ZCR > card where it just won't scale well. Without going into too many > details, we've tested RAID5, RAID10 and RAID50 on pretty much every > array size from 4-14 disks (raid 50 tests used more drives), using JFS, > reiserfs and EXT3. With every different configuration, performance > didn't improve after array size became greater than 6 disks.. We used > various benchmarks, including pgbench with scale factors of 10, 100, > 1000, 5000 and clients of 10, 15, 30 and 45. We've done many other > tests and monitoring tools, and we've come to the conclusion that the > ZCR is the problem. > > We're looking into getting an Adaptec 2200S or the Megaraid 320 2x which > have better processors, and hopefully better performance. We feel that > the use of the AIC7930 as the CPU on the ZCR just doesn't cut it and a > faster raid controller would work better. Does anyone out there have any > experience with these cards with postgresql and linux? If so, would you > be willing to share your experiences and possibly give a recommendation? > Did you consider the option of use an external storage array ? We are using the dell emc CX600 http://www.dell.com/downloads/emea/products/pvaul/en/Dell_EMC_cx600_specs.pdf and I'm forgotting to have a disk behind... Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: