Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40c5c12f-adad-fc86-7d43-ff7c535356ed@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-02-15 16:05, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Andrew Gierth 2019-02-15 <874l95m8w7.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> >> Also while we're tweaking regression test output, would it be possible >> to have some indicator of whether a test passed because a variant file >> in the resultmap was ignored in favor of the standard result? >> >> The current system of silently ignoring the resultmap means that nobody >> ever notices when resultmap entries become obsolete.... > > By the same argument, it should always print which variant file was > used so determining which _N.out files are still in use is possible. I would rather not overload the test output even more. A test passes or it doesn't. If we need to collect additional information, let's think about ways to do that separately. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: