Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40b87715-b594-9106-16bf-f3a520871902@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/25/2017 10:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Now, we could try to fix this bug, and add the regression test coverage > that the code clearly lacks, and upgrade the documentation about it from > its currently very sad state. But I think the right answer is just to > remove the feature altogether. It's evidently not being used, and it's > kind of insecure by design, and it would not be that hard for someone > to provide equivalent functionality entirely in userland if they really > wanted it. I don't see a reason to keep pl/tcl in core at all so ripping out the functionality seems the least disruptive and perhaps even a deprecation of the PL (at least from a core perspective) in v10. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: