Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40FDC9D1.5060705@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery (Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
I'm in favour of how it is now, so long as the comment is clear. It's the Unix Way :) Chris > I'd vote for it as a clarity factor too. > > Klaus Naumann wrote: > >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 markw@osdl.org wrote: >> >> >> >>> FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "archive_mode" >>> >>> Have I missed something since it has been committed? >>> >> >> >> Yes, Tom has removed this option in favorite of just setting >> archive_command to a value which then enables the PITR code also. >> >> But as I've seen this isn't discussed to the very end currently. >> >> My 2ct: I'd prefer to have archive_mode in the config as it really makes >> clear that this database is archiving. I fear users will not understand >> that giving a program for archival will also enable the PITR function. >> >> Greetings, Klaus >> >> >> >> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: