Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option
Дата
Msg-id 40FDC666.8050700@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T  ("David F. Skoll" <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>)
Ответы Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
Список pgsql-patches
> No, it doesn't.  I can look into that if you like.  The patch was
> entirely to satisfy a need some of our customers have.  The -T switch
> does fill a real need for our customers; our product has a couple of tables
> that aren't critical if they aren't backed up, but as the product evolves,
> we occasionally add more tables.  So it's easier to use a -T switch to
> say what *not* to back up, than multiple -t switches to say what to back up.

Well, since you wrote the patch, you'd be better off munging it.  Read
Tom's comments and see what you can come up with.  There's been no
decision made yet though on what changes to make however.

Chris


В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions
Следующее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump --clean w/ <= 7.2 server