NT + deadlock intended behaviour ?
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | NT + deadlock intended behaviour ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40F9B0FF.4060806@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: NT + deadlock intended behaviour ?
Re: NT + deadlock intended behaviour ? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm doing some experiments with NT, I din't expect this behaviuor: create table test ( a integer ); insert into test values (3); insert into test values (4); insert into test values (5); insert into test values (6); SESSION 1; SESSION 2; begin; begin; update test set a = 300 where a = 3; update test set a = 40 where a = 4; ~ begin; update test set a = 400 where a = 4; <BLOCKED> ~ update test set a = 30 where a = 3; ~ <DEAD LOCK DETECTED> ~ commit; <UNBLOCKED> <-- !?!?! ~ <here I'm able to do another commit> why SESSION 1 was unblocked ? If I repeat again but I do an abort: SESSION 1; SESSION 2; begin; begin; update test set a = 300 where a = 3; update test set a = 40 where a = 4; ~ begin; update test set a = 400 where a = 4; <BLOCKED> ~ update test set a = 30 where a = 3; ~ <DEAD LOCK DETECTED> ~ abort; <STILL BLOCKED> Why that commit unblock the SESSION 1? Regards Gaetano Mendola -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFA+bD+7UpzwH2SGd4RAq0VAJ9rZQ3aJmsJM6WSlLqIERJzDDS9iQCeL5rT rF7PkCaJ59PWNQw4CK6uvug= =Rb3s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: