Re: Timestamp Question
От | Oliver Jowett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Timestamp Question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40F1D5D8.2000205@opencloud.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Timestamp Question ("Dario V. Fassi" <software@sistemat.com.ar>) |
Ответы |
Re: Timestamp Question
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Dario V. Fassi wrote: > I say that would help a lot if the microseconds part of a timestamp will > be zero padded to a minimum length of 5 or 6 digits. > > Like: > > "then most databases can take 2004-07-10 12:59:59.123 as 2004-07-10 > 12:59:59.123000 " > > This behavior help is cross (vendor) database operations . Isn't this done by the driver already when dealing with a java.sql.Timestamp? Do you have a testcase that shows the problem? The server itself seems to already handle zero-padding just fine: > test=> select '2004-07-10 12:59:59.000123'::timestamp(6); > timestamp > ---------------------------- > 2004-07-10 12:59:59.000123 > (1 row) > > test=> select '2004-07-10 12:59:59.123'::timestamp(6); > timestamp > ------------------------- > 2004-07-10 12:59:59.123 > (1 row) > > > test=> select '2004-07-10 12:59:59.123000'::timestamp(6); > timestamp > ------------------------- > 2004-07-10 12:59:59.123 > (1 row) -O
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: