Re: plperl vs. plperlu
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plperl vs. plperlu |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40EFE9A3.1070508@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | plperl vs. plperlu (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plperl vs. plperlu
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
If trusted, the function is located inside a perl Safe container, a mechanism designed for just this purpose. Try doing something forbidden inside a trusted function (like opening a file) and you will see the error. cheers andrew Jan Wieck wrote: > while playing with the OSCON CD's, I noticed that the current version > of plperl installs the same function handler for both, plperl and > plperlu. I was wondering how it implements the important security > difference or, in case it is not handled and both are in fact the > same, who ignored this IMHO important difference in the naming > convention of procedural languages. > > > Jan >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: