Re: virtual fields on VIEW?
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: virtual fields on VIEW? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40D7385B.10502@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: virtual fields on VIEW? (raptor <raptor@tvskat.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: virtual fields on VIEW?
Re: virtual fields on VIEW? |
Список | pgsql-general |
raptor wrote: > > ]- re: to myself... In fact I was using postgres in the past afaik > 6.x versions or so (no outer joins, rule system was still not fully > working ... it was good on paper was good but, ... now glad it has > advanced so much :")).. then i got using Inter Base(FireBird). > (really cool db :") ) From what I see 7.x series has made huge step > forward.. probably now surpacing firebird on features side.. (they > had hard time adapting Interbase code) (no flame pls!) Firebird is the only viable open-source alternative to PG that I can think of (which has been a viable project for any length of time). > AFAIK firebird(interbase) and postgres are the only DB with > multiversioning engines, is that true ? I think Oracle has its version. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: