Re: Tablespace patch review
От | Andreas Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tablespace patch review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40D49339.1010002@pse-consulting.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tablespace patch review
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >[ switching to pghackers for wider comment ] > >Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > > >>By the way, I think that we should deny users the ability to create >>tablespaces that begin with pg_. Also, the existing ones should be >>pg_global and pg_default. That way, we have room to move if ever we >>decide we want more system tablespaces. It also makes it easier to dump >>non-system tablespaces. >> >> > >Seems like a reasonable suggestion to me. Any objections? > >BTW, another argument for this is that "default" is a reserved word. >I'd already noticed in testing that CREATE TABLE ... TABLESPACE default >doesn't work unless you double-quote "default". Calling it pg_default >would avoid that annoyance. > > CREATE .... TABLESPACE DEFAULT with default as keyword seems reasonable too, with default -> pg_default. I could think of cases where temporary schemas should go to a different tablespace, but AFAICS since these are created implicitely there's no way to redirect them. Maybe an additional attribute in pg_database for a default temp tablespace is desirable? Regards, Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: