Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use
От | zuhans@iname.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40D15E93.1060105@iname.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use ("Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use
|
Список | pgsql-general |
hello scott,
this is good news (for me ;-) )!
what kind of client should be available (if i search for a good hoster in near future)?
greetings
hans
Scott Marlowe schrieb:
this is good news (for me ;-) )!
what kind of client should be available (if i search for a good hoster in near future)?
greetings
hans
Scott Marlowe schrieb:
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 23:28, zuhans@iname.com wrote:hello, thank you for your short - but informative - answers! i don't know why this very very important thing isn't implemented by the jdbc (and other...) driver. it shouldn't only be managable by those sitting in front of the machine but also via my program to handle some critical situation in the way i want it to be done (and if i hoste my webapp somewhere in another continent, i won't be able to sit in front of the servers console-screen). to recode pg_dump is far off my time and (maybe) skills. why isn't it implemented for easier access?Well, pg_dump doesn't have to be run on the server, it can be run on a client halfway around the world from the server and work just fine. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: