Re: perl access
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: perl access |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40CE4ECE.4070902@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | perl access (Tom Allison <tallison@tacocat.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hello, I do not believe that to be the case. DBD::SPI is experimental but DBD: Pg is quite stable and I believe DBD is a requirement that works WITH DBI. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake Tom Allison wrote: > I'm used to using the DBI modules in perl. > The online docs mention DBD as expiremental. > > I'm thinking of sticking with DBI, unless there's some compelling > reason to do otherwise. > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: