Re: Trying to minimize the impact of checkpoints
От | Jack Orenstein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Trying to minimize the impact of checkpoints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40CB4102.7040000@geophile.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Trying to minimize the impact of checkpoints (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Trying to minimize the impact of checkpoints
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Jan Wieck wrote: > On 6/11/2004 2:02 PM, jao@geophile.com wrote: > >> Quoting jao@geophile.com: >> >>> When a checkpoint occurs, all operations slow way, way down. >>> The attached spreadsheet (xls file, prepared in OO so unlikely >>> to be dangerous) shows a run of a few hours, and the various spikes >>> every 25-30 minutes seem consistent with checkpointing. The >>> application is doing 1/2 reads and 1/2 inserts during this time. >> >> >> Sorry for being cryptic in my message. The spreadsheet contains >> iostat output. > > > Did you try to play with the background writer config options (new in > 7.5) at all? No, not yet. It looks like 7.5 won't be available in time for us to use in the first release of our product, so I've been very focused on how to best use 7.3-4. Any opinions on the stability of 7.5 and the effectiveness of the background writer in reducing variability in performance due to checkpoints? Jack Orenstein
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: