Re: Improving postgresql.conf
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Improving postgresql.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40C966C9.20608@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Improving postgresql.conf ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Re: Improving postgresql.conf |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bruce Momjian wrote: | Gaetano Mendola wrote: | |>Bruce Momjian wrote: |> |> > I understand your points below. However, the group has weighed in the |> > direction of clearly showing non-default values and not duplicating |> > documentation. We can change that, but you will need more folks |> > agreeing with your direction. |> |>I don't remember the behaviour but tell me what happen if |>I comment out a value changing the value. Kill UP the postmater. |>Recommenting that value and now re killing the postmaster. |> |>I believe that postmaster will not run with the default value. |>Who will look the configuration file will not understand the right |>reality. | | | If you comment a variable in postgresql.conf, it will use the | default value. That's not true at least with the version 7.4.2. Try yourself, I did the experiment changing the cpu_tuple_cost and commenting out the cpu_tuple_cost, after sending the SIGHUP to postmaster the value remain: 0.005 that is not the default value at all. Regards Gaetano Mendola -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAyWbI7UpzwH2SGd4RAre5AJ4sakTxqvcjbq8Cz6Qoj2bnDO5/7gCfTWdp nyWvDNTeQNEfwYJWHHL+0W0= =JFgw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: