Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
От | David Garamond |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40C18429.2010508@zara.6.isreserved.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? (Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
This probably has been discussed and is probably a very minor point, but consider how many more years we want to be able to use the <single digit>.<single digit> major release numbering. Assuming 1 year between major releases (7.3.0 -> 7.4.0 = +- 1 year), then we have 7.5-9.9 = 26 years = up until +- jul 2030. if we skip to 8.0 now, then we have up until 2023. Also we have 1 more chance to skip major number: 8.x -> 9.0. Imagine what features will there be in 9.0 that is ground-breaking enough. Because after that, we don't have any more major number to jump into without going into 2 digits. I personally don't see the major number as a very magical thing. Look at Linux for example. People still see 2.6 as very different/ahead compared to 2.4... -- dave
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: