Re: Optimizer bug??
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Optimizer bug?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40B26D65.4050808@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Optimizer bug?? ("Ismail Kizir" <ikizir@tumgazeteler.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ismail Kizir wrote: > Hi all, > > >>give us the result of these queries: >>SELECT COUNT(*) FROM articletbl; > > > 268726 records, it takes 34169 ms. to compute this > > >>SELECT COUNT(*) AS c FROM articletbl WHERE >>mydate BETWEEN '2004-04-24' AND '2004-05-24'; > > > 18982 records, it takes 34249 ms. to compute this. > > >>SELECT COUNT(*) AS c FROM articletbl WHERE >>mydate = '2004-04-24'; > > 850 records, it takes only 40 ms. to compute this. > > It is evident that there is a problem here! Am I wrong?? Try to do an explain analyze for both queries, and repeat the explain analyze but before disable the sequential scan ( "set enable_seq_scan=off" ). For sure what do you have is extimated cost higher, what do you have to do is decrease that cost, try with these values: random_page_cost = 2.5 cpu_tuple_cost = 0.005 cpu_index_tuple_cost = 0.0005 cpu_operator_cost = 0.0025 these are values that are good for a modern machine. Hackers, what about to decrease the default values for this quantities ? Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: