Re: Big problem
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Big problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40B23D8D.2050501@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Big problem (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Big problem
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: >>Hmmm - I agree it's difficult, but somehow I think it's something we >>should do. Just imagine if some major user of postgres did it - they'd >>be screaming blue murder... > > Shrug. Superusers can *always* shoot themselves in the foot in Postgres. > Try "delete from pg_proc", for instance. This sounds right up there > with the notion of preventing a Unix superuser from doing "rm -rf /". I have to agree. FWIW, I've seen a unix superuser do a recursive chmod 777 on /, and I've seen a Windows server admin recursively deny EVERYTHING from EVERYBODY starting at c:\. In both cases, we found that's why we keep regular backups ;-) Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: