Re: Optimizer bug??
От | Hans-Jürgen Schönig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Optimizer bug?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40B22E2E.503@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Optimizer bug?? ("Ismail Kizir" <ikizir@tumgazeteler.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ismail Kizir wrote: > Hi everybody, > > 1 .... EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) AS c FROM articletbl WHERE > ((mydate BETWEEN '2004-04-24' AND '2004-05-24' ) > ) > > 2 .... EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) AS c FROM articletbl WHERE > ((mydate = '2004-04-24') > ) > > (I ran VACUUM ANALYZE before running those) > > mydate is an indexed date column. > The optimizer optimizes the second query but, it doesn't optimize the first > one and decides to make a "sequential scan". > Is this a bug? > Or may someone explain me the reason? > > Thanks in advance. > > Ismail Kizir If 2004-04-24 to 2004-05-24 make up let's say 90% of your data PostgreSQL will find out that it is cheaper to use a seq scan instead of an index. This is not a bug at all - this is normal and desired behaviour ... Regards, Hans -- Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria Tel: +43/720/10 1234567 or +43/664/233 90 75 www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: