Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40AD4653.6060007@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Copeland wrote: > On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:30, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > >>On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:46:38PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: >> >> >>>fact that checkpoints, vacuum runs and pg_dumps bog down their machines >>>to the state where simple queries take several seconds care that much >>>for any Win32 port? Do you think it is a good sign for those who have >> >>Yes. I am one such person, but from the marketing side of things, I >>understand perfectly well what failing to deliver on Win32 again will >>cost. It's not important to _me_, but that doesn't mean it's >>unimportant to the project. >> > > > My primary fear about delivering Win32 with all of these other great > features is that, IMO, there is a higher level of risk associated with > these advanced features. At the same time, this will be the first trial > for many Win32 users. Should there be some problems, in general, or > worse, specific to Win32 users as it relates to these new features, it > could cost some serious Win32/PostgreSQL community points. A troubled > release which is experienced by Win32 users is going to be a battle cry > for MySQL. I believe that the very first Win32 native version will be declared "not realy ready for production", am I wrong ? Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: