Re: Email data type
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Email data type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40A8E1E7.5030504@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Email data type ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Email data type
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dave Page wrote: |>-----Original Message----- |>From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:mendola@bigfoot.com] |>Sent: 17 May 2004 16:02 |>To: Bruno Wolff III |>Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org |>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email data type |> |>About the domain literals, I think to validate it in the near |>future, rejecting private subnet according to this list: |> |>10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 |>172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 |>192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 |>169.254.0.0 -169.254.255.255 | | | Why? What's wrong with private addresses? Well I think that accept an email like: gmendola@192.168.212.2 is a risky. It's true that any RFC forbid this kind of emails, so I can accept it and leave to the final user the opportunity to extract the domain an validate it. Regards Gaetano Mendola -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAqOHm7UpzwH2SGd4RAp4dAJwNqDSws1cVwKr/QMXG/JvV/8M94QCbBfIS alixKQYe/VoLpwXrBFHszDs= =BAML -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: