Re: Email data type
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Email data type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40A8D3D0.7020103@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Email data type (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Ответы |
Re: Email data type
Re: Email data type |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Wolff III wrote: | On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 04:36:55 +0200, | Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com> wrote: | |>The type is indexable and provide also conversion methods: |> |>text <--> email |>and the operator >>, is possible use it in select like: | | | When you are converting between text and email data, what format are the | text version of the address going to be? For example you might be using | rfc2821 encoding, rfc2822 encoding or concatenating the local part, | an @ sign and the domain name. Don't forget about domain literals. Actually I use <local_part>@<domain_name> Also the validator will validate emails in this form, if you are thinking to validate emails as: "Gaetano M. Public"(junior)<gmendola@(new account)bigfoot.com> that are perfectly valid I think that it's a valid option to consider. About the domain literals, I think to validate it in the near future, rejecting private subnet according to this list: 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 169.254.0.0 -169.254.255.255 I think I have to discard also the addresses with last octet equal to 256. Any comments ? Regards Gaetano Mendola -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAqNPP7UpzwH2SGd4RAgqxAJ9UCPOOTpPN6Tl9w1748inn7t4a/QCg7pl1 8O3lHDwEKsCuCOJYQAo0vHM= =wFo+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: