Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
От | Matthew T. O'Connor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40915833.7010801@zeut.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Well, if Win32 doesn't complete by June 1, do we still do the feature > freeze? I don't want to be adding features after the freeze, that is > for sure. When we have done that in the past, it has caused problems > because some stuff gets in to make the system unstable, but other stuff > gets left out. It seams as though the win32 port is driving the release schedule, so instead of picking June 1 out of the air, how about getting an estimated time for completion from them, or more specifically a date by which they should have all the major features done? I know it's a chicken and egg problem, do we set a date for developers to shoot for, or do shoot for specific features and choose a date from there. I think there can no hard and fast rule on this, it depends on the feature and the desire to put it in place. Matthew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: