Re: Bringing PostgreSQL torwards the standard regarding

I wrote:

>
>
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 12:23:55PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>> I don't think we should rush at this. All of these solutions are 
>>> based on the existing structures. I have started thinking about a 
>>> solution that would involve keeping two versions of catalog names: a 
>>> canonical name and a "name as supplied at creation".
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Why do you want two names?  Just keep the original casing, and a boolean
>> saying if it's quoted or not.
>>  
>>
>
> Because I was not just considering the upper/lower issue - refer to 
> the thread that relates to unquoted names with case preserved. 



Sorry - brain malfunction  - yes, original casing plus boolean would 
work. In effect you could derive the canonical form from those two.

cheers

andrew