Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4086BA6E.70105@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, My personal opinion is that contrib should be removed entirely. Just have a contrib.txt that says all contrib modules are at pgfoundry or whatever. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake Jan Wieck wrote: > Taking into account that quite a few people have repeatedly stated that > the components in contrib are considered more supported/recommended than > similar solutions found on gborg or any other external site, I suggest > we move the projects dbmirror and dblink to gborg. The rserv contrib > module seems to me to be an early Perl prototype of erserver, nobody is > working on any more. I suggest we drop that entirely. > > Comments/alternatives? > > > Jan >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: