Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e1003011646t48b41b44sc5fc610cacae34b9@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<p>josh, nobody is talking about it because it doesn't make sense. you could only retry if it was the first query in thetransaction and only if you could prove there were no side-effects outside the database and then you would have no reasonto think the retry would be any more likely to work. <p>greg<p><blockquote type="cite">On 1 Mar 2010 22:32, "Josh Berkus"<<a href="mailto:josh@agliodbs.com">josh@agliodbs.com</a>> wrote:<br /><br /><p><font color="#500050">On 2/28/107:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:<br />>> However, I'd still like to hear from someone with the requ...</font> "deadend" as in "too hard to implement"? Or for some other reason?<br /><br /> It's undeniable that auto-retry would bebetter from a user's<br /> perspective than a user-visible cancel. So if it's *reasonable* to<br /> implement, I thinkwe should be working on it. I'm also very puzzled as<br /> to why nobody else wants to even discuss it; it's like somewierd blackout.<br /><font color="#888888"><br /> --Josh Berkus<br /></font><p><font color="#500050"><br />-- <br />Sentvia pgsql-hackers mailing list (<a href="mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org">pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org</a>)<br/>To make changes to your subs...</font></blockquote>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: