Re: unresolved bugs
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unresolved bugs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e1001061655q304bff94nd6762190659ef462@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unresolved bugs (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: unresolved bugs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Agreed. I really don't think a bug tracker helps us. We need two things: > > (1) to respond to bug submissions immediately and fix them, and > (2) if we can't fix the bugs immediately, to add them to a TODO list > > Adding stuff to a bug tracker is just a way to procrastinate on it > indefinitely. > It's up to us what issues we want to track in what system. It's perfectly acceptable to say any todo items are tracked outside in the TODO wiki page. And incidentally I agree with you. But we also have the open items list that Bruce (sorry I should have credited you before) and Tom and now apparently Robert track. These issues are usually tracked for the current development tree because we're more willing to leave these pending in the development tree but they also come up for point releases. Sometimes we're not sure what the right fix is right away or we're waiting on some research or debugging work but they have to be taken care of for the next release or declared non-bugs or not worth fixing. They shouldn't just be forgotten about. So far we've done a good job but it would be more credible for people not following the lists if we could point them at the current list at any time and see what kind of known issues we have and what happens to issues they report. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: