Re: pg_attribute.attnum - wrong column ordinal?
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_attribute.attnum - wrong column ordinal? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e0911241730j52ca3099oe7bce71adf1318e1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_attribute.attnum - wrong column ordinal? (Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_attribute.attnum - wrong column ordinal?
Re: pg_attribute.attnum - wrong column ordinal? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm@gmail.com> wrote: > My question: can pg_attribute.attnum be used to determine the sequential > ordinal positions of columns in a table? What is a right way to get the > ordinal numbers? You could use something like: row_number() over (partition by T.schemaname,T.viewname order by attnum) as "ORDINAL_POSITION" If you just stick this in there in place of attnum it'll cause an extra sort. It should be possible with enough clever rearranging of the query to do the whole query with a single sort since that's the same sort order that the results are ordered in. Incidentally you probably want UNION ALL rather than UNION in the original query. -- greg
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: