On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> All that we have to do to fix the first one is to put the LockRows node
> below the Limit node instead of above it. The solution for the second
> one is to also put LockRows underneath the Sort node, and to regard its
> output as unsorted so that a Sort node will certainly be generated.
> (This in turn implies that we should prefer the cheapest-total plan
> for the rest of the query.)
I'm not following how this would work. Would it mean that every record
would end up being locked?
--
greg