Re: WIP: remove use of flat auth file for client authentication
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: remove use of flat auth file for client authentication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e0908290151i72ba76f9ub78c5b932ef2d9eb@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | WIP: remove use of flat auth file for client authentication (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: remove use of flat auth file for client authentication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Attached is a patch that removes the use of the flat auth file during > client authentication, instead using regular access to the pg_auth > catalogs. As previously discussed, this implies pushing the > authentication work down to InitPostgres. I didn't yet do anything > about the idea of falling back to connecting to "postgres" when the > specified target DB doesn't exist, but other than that small change > I think it's about ready to go. Falling back to connecting to "postgres" seems unnecessarily complex to me. > Another interesting point is that for this to work, those signal > interrupts have to actually be enabled (doh) ... and up to now we have > been running InitPostgres with most signals disabled. I suspect that > this means some things are actively broken during InitPostgres's initial > transaction --- for example, if it happens to try to take a lock that > completes a deadlock cycle, the deadlock won't be detected because the > lock timeout SIGALRM interrupt will never occur. Another example is > that SI inval messaging isn't working during InitPostgres either. > The patch addresses this by moving up PostgresMain's > PG_SETMASK(&UnBlockSig); call to before InitPostgres. We might need to > back-patch that bit, though I'm hesitant to fool with such a thing in > back branches. The deadlock can only fail to be detected by someone else if the whole initpostgres thing takes longer than deadlock_timout I think. So it doesn't seem very likely. Not sure how likely problems due to missed SI messages are. > > Thoughts, objections, better ideas? > > regards, tom lane > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > > -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: