Re: Bug in date arithmetic
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in date arithmetic |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e0908241313t20b0e78ekeb524846850cbbef@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in date arithmetic (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in date arithmetic
Re: Bug in date arithmetic Re: Bug in date arithmetic |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:27 PM, David Fetter<david@fetter.org> wrote: > I'm thinking that the unknown literal here should just cause an error > in the case of '+'. Same with '-', for what it's worth. That would make a lot of people very unhappy. They expect things like select date + '1 year' to just work. The problem is that they would also like select date - '1year' and select date - '2000-01-01' to work. I wonder if we could get around this by inventing a new type date_or_interval which looks at the input and decides which it is using fairly strict rules. date_sub would take that type and do the appropriate operation based on what the constant had in it. Of course we still want to be able to do date1 - date2 or date1+intervalcolumn so we would need implicit casts from date and interval to this new type. The question is whether we could arrange things so this implicit cast doesn't cause ambiguity elsewhere. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: