Re: Slaying the HYPOTamus
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slaying the HYPOTamus |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e0908222139t35ad3ad2q3e6b15646a27dd64@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Slaying the HYPOTamus (Paul Matthews <plm@netspace.net.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slaying the HYPOTamus
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Paul Matthews<plm@netspace.net.au> wrote: > > The hypot() function has been part of the C standard since C99 (ie 10 > years ago) Postgres targets C89. The date of the standard is when the standard came out, it takes years before it's widely available and then years again before the systems with the old compiler are no longer interesting. If there's a performance advantage then we could add a configure test and define the macro to call hypot(). You said it existed before C99 though, how widespread was it? If it's in all the platforms we support it might be reasonable to just go with it. > The function is designed not to fail where the current naive macro would > result in overflow. The code seems to be blissfully unaware of overflow dangers :( Even if hypot() avoids spurious overflows it's always possible for there to be a legitimate overflow which we ought to detect and handle properly. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: