Re: "Hot standby"?
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Hot standby"? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e0908111844o38f79a39h1d1efabb5362904e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "Hot standby"? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "Hot standby"?
Re: "Hot standby"? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> So really, the "streaming replication" patch should be called "hot >> standby", > > No. AIUI, hot standby means that when your primary falls over, the > secondary automatically promotes itself and takes over. No! This is *not* what "hot standby" means, at least not in the Oracle world. The "hot" in "hot standby" is not a reference to the hot backups or replication behaviour. It means to the fact that the server is able to take queries. Ie, It's a living breathing server, not one in some kind of half-alive state like a warm standby server. Essentially "hot" vs "warm" versus uh, "plain old standby server" refer to how alive the server is. A traditional standby server was a machine which was available to take over after a restore. A warm standby was one that was constantly replaying logs and could be given life quickly. A hot standby was actually alive. I think the term "warm standby" and "hot standby" were actually by analogy to the older term "hot spare" which referred to a machine which was on and hooked up and ready to go as opposed to one which was in the cupboard and could be deployed after manual intervention. >> and the "hot standby" patch should be called "read only slaves"? > > Yes. > >> And *why* can't we call it log-based replication? > > Well, we can call it anything we want. For example, up until now > we've been calling it "hot standby", even though that's clearly wrong. > :-) "log based replication", "read-only slaves", and "hot standby" are all 100% accurate descriptions of what the hot standby patch enables. I do like "read only slaves" because it's the most precise and meaningful. By comparison, it's not clear whether "log based replication" is what we've had since 8.0 or whether it's multi-master read-write replication. And "hot standby" is buzzwordy and depends on Oracle experience to acquire any meaning. When we have sync replication you'll also have to distinguish whether the slave/standby/replica are sync slaves or async slaves and if they're async what asynchronous mode they're in, streaming or file-based. Using "hot" to describe those aspects would be horribly confusing to Oracle users. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: