Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e0908031724x365b2fc5v64aab1f880261ec6@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > One other stylistic gripe: I don't much like inserting a GUC variable > definition into builtins.h --- that file has traditionally only > contained function extern declarations. The best alternative I can > think of is to move the bytea-related stuff into a new include file > include/utils/bytea.h. Has anyone got an objection or a better idea? The other guc that controls default i/o formats for a data type is DateStyle. I can't say I expected to find that in miscadmin.h though. Perhaps move both of them into a utils/adt.h or something like that? -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: