Re: Video available for PGDay SJC '09
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Video available for PGDay SJC '09 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e0907281555u68f08c6x55fa0b008168cc73@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Video available for PGDay SJC '09 (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Video available for PGDay SJC '09
Re: Video available for PGDay SJC '09 |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Christophe Pettus<xof@thebuild.com> wrote: > > Historically, MOV has been the least-bad container format; Flash support on > anything besides Windows has, traditionally, been very spotty. The files > themselves are pretty much the same size; FLV is (as noted) a container > format, not a codec, and the video is H.264 either way. (fwiw H.264 isn't a codec either... it's a compression format which can be generated by various codecs) I think I'm scarred from Quicktime files because they often were encoded with codecs like Sorensen which produced proprietary formats. What does IE or firefox < 3.5 really do if you just link to an mpeg file? Doesn't it run whatever app is set to handle that format? Why is a flash plugin based page better than that? I have a feeling I'm just being iconoclastic for the sake of it here. In reality I would be pretty happy with any page that had a link at the bottom to download an mpeg format file with H.264 data in it that mplayer can play. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: