Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407d949e0907071010v71e2bafam6d5fc6ae56e2fed5@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> (I'm sure we can do something intelligent with privileges that don't >> apply to all object types rather than just fail. e.g. UPDATE privilege >> should be same as USAGE on a sequence.) > > Anything you do in that line will be an ugly kluge, and will tend to > encourage insecure over-granting of privileges (ie GRANT ALL ON ALL > OBJECTS ... what's the point of using permissions at all then?) That seems a bit pessimistic. While I disagree with Simon's rule I think you can get plenty of mileage out of a more conservative rule of just granting the privilege to all objects for which that privilege is defined. Especially when you consider that we allow listing multiple privileges in a single command. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: