Re: [ SOLVED ] select count(*) very slow on an already
От | pginfo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ SOLVED ] select count(*) very slow on an already |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 407E6AF8.7643C61F@t1.unisoftbg.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | select count(*) very slow on an already vacuumed table. (Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi , I am not sure, but I remember the same problem. It was ot 7.3.x version and and I needet to reindex the table. I think after 7.4 vacuum also work correct with reindex. But I am not sure. regards, ivan. Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote: > Hi, > > The problem was solved by reloading the Table. > the query now takes only 3 seconds. But that is > not a solution. > > The problem is that such phenomenon obscures our > judgement used in optimising queries and database. > > If a query runs slow we really cant tell if its a problem > with query itself , hardware or dead rows. > > I already did vacumm full on the table but it still did not > have that effect on performance. > In fact the last figures were after doing a vacuum full. > > Can there be any more elegent solution to this problem. > > Regds > Mallah. > > Richard Huxton wrote: > > >On Thursday 15 April 2004 08:10, Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote: > > > > > >>The problem is that i want to know if i need a Hardware upgrade > >>at the moment. > >> > >>Eg i have another table rfis which contains ~ .6 million records. > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>SELECT count(*) from rfis where sender_uid > 0; > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>Time: 117560.635 ms > >> > >>Which is approximate 4804 records per second. Is it an acceptable > >>performance on the hardware below: > >> > >>RAM: 2 GB > >>DISKS: ultra160 , 10 K , 18 GB > >>Processor: 2* 2.0 Ghz Xeon > >> > >> > > > >Hmm - doesn't seem good, does it? If you run it again, is it much faster > >(since the data should be cached then)? What does "vmstat 10" show while > >you're running the query? > > > >One thing you should have done is read the performance tuning guide at: > > http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/index.php > >The default values are very conservative, and you will need to change them. > > > > > > > >>What kind of upgrades shoud be put on the server for it to become > >>reasonable fast. > >> > >> > > > >If you've only got one disk, then a second disk for OS/logging. Difficult to > >say more without knowing numbers of users/activity etc. > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: