Re: [OT] Porting from Oracle [was Connection Idle in transaction]
От | Hans-Jürgen Schönig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [OT] Porting from Oracle [was Connection Idle in transaction] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40768B51.8090104@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [OT] Porting from Oracle [was Connection Idle in transaction] (Andrew Rawnsley <ronz@ravensfield.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Andrew Rawnsley wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2004, at 4:58 AM, Tim Pizey wrote: > >> >> >> What can Oracle do that PG can't ? >> > > Bankrupt you? Make your hair fall out? Cause ulcers? The list is > endless.... > > ;-) pro: OLAP, recursive queries, clustering, tablespaces, advanced queuing, bitmap indexing, index organized tables, materialized views, database links, nested tables, cubes, ... (just to name a few). contra: bankrupt you, driver your dbas crazy, malloc(size_of(ram) * 1000) Don't get me wrong. PostgreSQL is a damn good product and it supports 95% of all commonly used features. However, it is not time yet to tell that we can do EVERYTHING oracle can do and that Oracle is already completely obsolete. There are still areas which cannot be covered with PostgreSQL For a "normal" database PostgreSQL is definitely the better choice but when working with cubes and so forth it can be damn hard. More work is needed to make PostgreSQL support these features. Regards, Hans -- Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria Tel: +43/2952/30706 or +43/664/233 90 75 www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: