Re: Question on comment
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question on comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4074.971845377@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question on comment (Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> writes: > Hm, OK. How are the access rights to this table when 'comment on' is > used? Use the source, Luke ... a quick scan of command/comment.c shows that it allows the owner of an object to comment on that object, and no one else. Access rights to pg_description itself don't matter. The general practice in Postgres is that system tables are accessible read-only to everyone, but are writable only via specialized commands (like COMMENT ON for pg_description). The database superuser is not so restricted, and can shoot himself in the foot with abandon ;-) > I remember trying earlier to use this table to store comments, but > discovered each user had to have write access, even to add comments on > their own tables. Is this problem fixed? An explicit "INSERT INTO pg_description" would be treated that way. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: